Information about Measure
First Name	Sylvia
Last Name	Kaaya
Email	—
Affiliation	Muhimnili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Department of Psychiatry
Other means of contacting author (e.g., website, Academia.edu, ResearchGate)	https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sylvia_Kaaya3
Mental health assessment tool that was adapted/developed/validated	Dar-es-Salaam Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ)
Mental health condition assessed	Anxiety and Depression
Idiom of distress included, if any	Numerous
Lifestage of interest	Adult (General)
Age range (age – age)	15-48
Country or countries where tool was developed/adapted/validated	Tanzania
Language(s) of the adapted/developed/validated tool	Kiswahili
Clinical or community sample?	Clinical
Subpopulation in which tool was developed/validated (e.g., tool was developed and tested among middle-class women)?	Antenatal clinic attendees in Dar-es-Salaam
Development procedures	locally-developed, validated, culturally-adapted
If validated, what was the gold standard?	Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25)
Description of other development procedures, if applicable	—
Cronbach’s alpha	0.84
Sensitivity	—
Spec	—
Other information about tool (e.g., additional psychometrics [NPV, PPV, Youden’s index, diagnostic odds ratio])	Additional psychometrics evaluated include: inter-rater reliability (intraclass r = 0.89), and test-retest reliability (intraclass r = 0.82).
Links to development/adaptation/validation studies and/or previous studies using the tool	Lee, B., Kaaya, S. F., Mbwambo, J. K., Smith-Fawzi, M. C., & Leshabari, M. T. (2008). Detecting Depressive Disorder With the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 in Tanzania. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 54(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764006074995
Notes when administering the tool	The DSQ should be administered verbally to participants by trained research assistants.

	Information about Measure
First Name	Elizabeth
Last Name	Lowenthal
Email	—
Affiliation	University of Pennsylvania
Other means of contacting author (e.g., website, Academia.edu, ResearchGate)	—
Mental health assessment tool that was adapted/developed/validated	Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC)
Mental health condition assessed	General Mental Health/Wellbeing/Quality of Life
Idiom of distress included, if any	Not Applicable
Lifestage of interest	Childhood or Adolescence
Country or countries where tool was developed/adapted/validated	Botswana
Language(s) of the adapted/developed/validated tool	Setswana
Clinical or community sample?	Clinical
Subpopulation in which tool was developed/validated (e.g., tool was developed and tested among middle-class women)?	HIV-infected children aged 8 to 16 years old attending infectious disease clinics
Development procedures	Culturally adapted
If validated, what was the gold standard?	—
Description of other development procedures, if applicable	—
Cronbach’s alpha	0.87
Sensitivity	0.62
Spec	0.86
Other information about tool (e.g., additional psychometrics [NPV, PPV, Youden’s index, diagnostic odds ratio])	The area under the curve (AUC) for the full 35-item scale was 0.85. Based off of this study, a cut-off score of 20 is recommended. The psychometric properties were assessed for the full 35-item PSC, as well as a shortened 17-item version. More information about the shortened 17-item version of the scale is detailed in the original publication.
Links to development/adaptation/validation studies and/or previous studies using the tool	Lowenthal, E., Lawler, K., Harari, N., Moamogwe, L., Masunge, J., Masedi, M., Gross, R. (2011). Validation of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist in HIV-infected Batswana. Journal of Child & Adolescent Mental Health, 23(1), 17-28. doi:10.2989/17280583.2011.594245
Notes when administering the tool	The PSC should be verbally delivered to caregivers by trained research assistants. The youth version of the PSC (PSC-Y) can be completed by children if deemed appropriate, and should also be verbally administered by trained research assistants who can aid in the completion of the scale.

	Information about Measure
First Name	Gillian
Last Name	Ice
Email	—
Affiliation	Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine
Other means of contacting author (e.g., website, Academia.edu, ResearchGate)	—
Mental health assessment tool that was adapted/developed/validated	Luo Perceived Stress Scale
Mental health condition assessed	Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorders
Idiom of distress included, if any	kimi, yiengni, tetni, jachir, bebni
Lifestage of interest	Elderly
Age range (age – age)	—
Country or countries where tool was developed/adapted/validated	Kenya
Language(s) of the adapted/developed/validated tool	Dholuo
Clinical or community sample?	Community
Subpopulation in which tool was developed/validated (e.g., tool was developed and tested among middle-class women)?	—
Development procedures	locally-developed
If validated, what was the gold standard?	Criterion validity was examined through the associations between LPSS score and caregiving, social networks, depression, and cortisol
Description of other development procedures, if applicable	—
Cronbach’s alpha	0.75
Sensitivity	—
Spec	—
Other information about tool (e.g., additional psychometrics [NPV, PPV, Youden’s index, diagnostic odds ratio])	—
Links to development/adaptation/validation studies and/or previous studies using the tool	Ice, G. H., & Yogo, J. (2005). Measuring Stress Among Luo Elders: Development of the Luo Perceived Stress Scale. Field Methods, 17(4), 394-411. doi:10.1177/1525822×05280176
Notes when administering the tool	The LPSS should be administered verbally by trained research assistants. Items are coded dichotonomously, positive items are reverse coded, and the LPSS total score is calculated by summing all items with equal weight.

	Information about Measure
First Name	Charlotte
Last Name	Hanlon
Email	charlotte.hanlon@kcl.ac.uk
Affiliation	King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry
Other means of contacting author (e.g., website, Academia.edu, ResearchGate)	—
Mental health assessment tool that was adapted/developed/validated	Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ)
Mental health condition assessed	Depressive Disorders
Idiom of distress included, if any	Not Applicable
Lifestage of interest	Adult (General)
Age range (age – age)	—
Country or countries where tool was developed/adapted/validated	Ethiopia
Language(s) of the adapted/developed/validated tool	Amharic
Clinical or community sample?	Community
Subpopulation in which tool was developed/validated (e.g., tool was developed and tested among middle-class women)?	Perinatal women in rural Ethiopia
Development procedures	culturally-adapted,validated
If validated, what was the gold standard?	The gold standard measure of perinatal CMD used in this assessment was full psychiatric assessment by one of four Ethiopian psychiatry trainees
Description of other development procedures, if applicable	—
Cronbach’s alpha	0.88
Sensitivity	0.684
Spec	0.62
Other information about tool (e.g., additional psychometrics [NPV, PPV, Youden’s index, diagnostic odds ratio])	Area under the curve (AUC) was 0.70 (95%CI 0.57 to 0.83).
Links to development/adaptation/validation studies and/or previous studies using the tool	Hanlon, C., Medhin, G., Alem, A., Araya, M., Abdulahi, A., Hughes, M., . . . Prince, M. (2008). Detecting perinatal common mental disorders in Ethiopia: Validation of the self-reporting questionnaire and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Journal of Affective Disorders, 108(3), 251-262. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2007.10.023
Notes when administering the tool	The SRQ-20 should be administered as a verbal interview, with appropriate probing of responses to items which require repetition, appear to to be understood, or are answered affirmatively. All interviews should be conducted by trained research assistants.

	Information about Measure
First Name	Theresa
Last Name	Betancourt
Email	theresa.betancourt@bc.edu
Affiliation	Boston College School of Social Work
Other means of contacting author (e.g., website, Academia.edu, ResearchGate)	—
Mental health assessment tool that was adapted/developed/validated	Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC)
Mental health condition assessed	Depressive Disorders
Idiom of distress included, if any	Not Applicable
Lifestage of interest	Childhood or Adolescence
Age range (age – age)	—
Country or countries where tool was developed/adapted/validated	Rwanda
Language(s) of the adapted/developed/validated tool	Kinyarwanda
Clinical or community sample?	Community
Subpopulation in which tool was developed/validated (e.g., tool was developed and tested among middle-class women)?	—
Development procedures	culturally-adapted,validated
If validated, what was the gold standard?	To examine criterion validity, CES-DC scores were compared with depression diagnoses on a structured diagnostic interview, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children (MINI KID). Caregiver and child or adolescent self-reports endorsing the presence of local depression-like problems agahinda kenshi (persistent sorrow) and kwiheba (severe hopelessness) were also examined for agreement with MINI KID diagnosis.
Description of other development procedures, if applicable	—
Cronbach’s alpha	0.86
Sensitivity	0.819
Spec	0.719
Other information about tool (e.g., additional psychometrics [NPV, PPV, Youden’s index, diagnostic odds ratio])	The area under the ROC curve for the CES-DC using MINI KID MDE diagnosis as the gold standard was 0.825.
Links to development/adaptation/validation studies and/or previous studies using the tool	Betancourt, T., Scorza, P., & Meyers-Ohki, S. (2013). Validating the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children in Rwanda. PsycEXTRA Dataset. doi:10.1037/e593732013-001
Notes when administering the tool	Given the age of participants, caregivers reported on children who were too young to complete the assessment independently. The tool should either be administered to the adolescents or to their primary caregiver, as is deemed fit by researchers.  The tool should be administered by trained research assistants who are fluent in Kinyarwanda. All items on the scale are summed with equal weight. The optimal cut-off score for this population was determined to be 30 points.