|Information about Measure|
|Affiliation||Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital|
|Other means of contacting author (e.g., website, Academia.edu, ResearchGate)||—|
|Mental health assessment tool that was adapted/developed/validated||Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale|
|Mental health condition assessed||Trauma- and stressor-related disorders|
|Idiom of distress included, if any||Not Applicable|
|Lifestage of interest||Adult (General)|
|Age range (age – age)||—|
|Country or countries where tool was developed/adapted/validated||United States with Cambodian Refugees|
|Language(s) of the adapted/developed/validated tool||Khmer|
|Clinical or community sample?||Clinical|
|Subpopulation in which tool was developed/validated (e.g., tool was developed and tested among middle-class women)?||Refugees attending a psychiatric clinic in the United States.|
|Development procedures||Culturally adapted|
|If validated, what was the gold standard?||—|
|Description of other development procedures, if applicable||—|
|Other information about tool (e.g., additional psychometrics [NPV, PPV, Youden’s index, diagnostic odds ratio])||The CAPS demonstrated good interrater (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .92) and test–retest (ICC = .84) reliability. For the 179 patients interviewed by the trained social worker, the CAPS coefficient alpha was .92, and the item–total correlations ranged from .48 to .85. The two items with the lowest item–subscale correlations were “inability to recall important aspects of the trauma” (.47) and “restricted range of affect” (.52).
Reexperiencing (cluster B: items 1–5): Coefficient alpha .91; Corrected item − total correlation .69–.84
Avoidance and numbing (cluster C: items 6–12): Coefficient alpha .87; Corrected item − total correlation
Hyperarousal (cluster D: items 13–17): Coefficient alpha .86; Corrected item − total correlation .56–.75
|Links to development/adaptation/validation studies and/or previous studies using the tool||Hinton, Devon E., Dara Chhean, Vuth Pich, M. H. Pollack, Scott P. Orr, and Roger K. Pitman. 2006. “Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Cambodian Refugees Using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale: Psychometric Properties and Symptom Severity.” Journal of Traumatic Stress 19 (3): 405–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20115.|
|Notes when administering the tool||Tool was translated and back-translated for use among Cambodian refugee populations in the United States. Only patients who were exposed to the Cambodian genocide (1975–1979) were included in the study. Of the 179 patients surveyed, 62% (111/179) were women. The average age was 55.4 years (SD = 8.1). Patients had lived in the United States an average of 17.8 years (SD = 3.9), and eight patients spoke English with some degree of fluency (i.e., could communicate in a medication session without need of translation).
The CAPS provides ratings of the frequency and intensity of each of the 17 DSM-IV–based PTSD symptoms on 0–4 Likert-type scales, thereby allowing for a maximal score of 8 for each symptom (Weathers et al., 2001) and a total-score range from 0 to 136. Weathers and associates (2001) suggested the following score categories: 0–19: asymptomatic/few symptoms; 20–39: mild PTSD/subthreshold; 40–59: moderate PTSD/threshold; 60–79: severe PTSD symptoms; and > 80: extreme PTSD symptoms.
https://thefpr.org/wp-content/uploads/fpr-horizontal-130-crop.png 0 0 Kathy Trang https://thefpr.org/wp-content/uploads/fpr-horizontal-130-crop.png Kathy Trang2019-03-20 08:34:192019-12-11 22:45:41Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale